|
VIEW FROM THE OTHER SIDE:
Public Sector Perspectives
|
|
January 2005 (revised) |
A series of white papers
|
Relationship
Management:
Being a Partner vs. Just Being a Vendor
Historically, major information technology (IT)
projects have failed at alarming rates. This is
particularly true in the public sector. It has
been my experience that the relationship between
service provider and the public sector entity
can be a differentiator. In fact, it could
literally define success or failure.
More recently most service providers propose to
be partners with their public sector entities as
a means to proclaim their commitment, overcome
misunderstandings and mitigate adversarial
relationships. The term “partnership” however
is not well defined and therefore open to
interpretation.
From 1998 until my retirement in 2003 as state
CIO for Pennsylvania, I managed in excess of
$1.2 Billion in state IT projects. Even though
all service providers purported to have a
partnership with state government, only a few
acted as a partner.
The matrix below defines, from my perspective,
the differences between just being a vendor
(typical service provider) and being a true
partner.
|
CRITERIA |
VENDOR |
PARTNER |
|
Financial Approach |
Sees Revenue |
Sees Opportunity |
|
Executive Involvement |
When Problems Develop |
Continuously |
|
Project Management |
Command & Control |
Collaborative |
|
Knowledge Transfer |
Disinterested |
Viewed as a Mentor |
©2007, Gerhards Consulting Group. All rights reserved.